|
centrifigal clutch operation | |||
Post Reply | Forum |
Posted by: komet99 ® 04/11/2007, 13:43:31 Author Profile eMail author Edit |
Before I get started, I am talking about a centrifigal disc clutch not a centrifigal shoe clutch. As a kart racer I am always looking for mre edge. Recently I have been working on my clutch. What I want to know, is basically how do I set this thing up and have optimum performance from an equational standpoint. If I remove surface area(friction disc), will the clutch work better for the purpose of applying the same psi to less surface area(friction disc)??? I have added all the weight I can to the clutch. Can I remove spring pressure?? I have be round and round with many people that cannot tell me an answer that makes sense....just same theories that I have. The question is: Is there a combination of spring pressure, surface area and weight to make a clutch work to its optimum performance. Dale |
Post Reply Tell a Friend (must be logged in) Alert Admin About Post |
View All | | Next | |
Replies to this message |
Re: centrifigal clutch operation | |||
Re: centrifigal clutch operation -- komet99 | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: randykimball ® 04/11/2007, 16:29:47 Author Profile eMail author Edit |
Dale,
You can reduce counter spring tension. You can increase the mass of the throw weights. You can increase the leverage the throw weights have on the disk tension (modify the weight levers pivot point location)(provided there are any). I would NOT decrease the clutch disk size, this would reduce grip... something you do not want to do. (You can end up with a clutch that won't slip when you need it to) The worst suggestion of your lifetime may be the catalyst to the grandest idea of the century, never let suggestions go unsaid nor fail to listen to them. |
Post Reply Tell a Friend (must be logged in) Alert Admin About Post |
Where am I? Original Top of thread | | | |
Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation | |||
Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation -- randykimball | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: komet99 ® 04/11/2007, 16:34:25 Author Profile eMail author Edit |
If I reduce clutch surface area, doesnt that put the same force on less area, which would make it slip less. I have already remove one disc of the clutch to see what happens. The clutch worked fine but I had too much spring pressure. So my next move would be to find a clutch spring with less tension. Dale |
Post Reply Tell a Friend (must be logged in) Alert Admin About Post |
Where am I? Original Top of thread | | | |
Re: Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation | |||
Re: Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation -- komet99 | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: Kelly Bramble ® 04/11/2007, 21:18:17 Author Profile eMail author Edit |
In general the following is true T = P*u*n*r Where: P = Total applied force of disk against friction pad (Lbs) Springs?
So, if you increase P,u,n, or r you have more Torque capacity. All you realy need is to reduce the slippage between the friction pads and the disk. At some point if there is not any slippage then you are doing all you can. To me, the answer may be in the mechanism that applies the force P at the right rpm and torque for your particular motor configuration. Reference: Kent's Mechanical Engineers Handbook, Design and Production Volume, Twelfth Edition Modified by Kelly Bramble at Wed, Apr 11, 2007, 21:19:53 |
Post Reply Tell a Friend (must be logged in) Alert Admin About Post |
Where am I? Original Top of thread | | | |
Re: Re: Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation | |||
Re: Re: Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation -- Kelly Bramble | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: Kelly Bramble ® 04/12/2007, 17:27:31 Author Profile eMail author Edit |
I think that P (Total applied force of disk against friction pad (Lbs)) can be further defined as P = RPM * C Where: RPM = Revolutions per minute
C is derived from the characteristics of the centifugal clutch |
Post Reply Tell a Friend (must be logged in) Alert Admin About Post |
Where am I? Original Top of thread | | | |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation | |||
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation -- Kelly Bramble | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: komet99 ® 04/12/2007, 17:49:00 Author Profile eMail author Edit |
To tell you more information. The clutch is located on the axle. With the expansion chamber manufacturers we have working with us to get more horsepower, the racers must engage the clutch at 10,800 engine rpm. Now when I start a race, it is from a dead stop. So the motor revs to 10,800 rpm untill the axle speed catches up with the clutch speed which is around 50-55 mph. This is the time that I want to reduce. Some people told me the only way to reduce this time is to make more horsepower. Completely understandable----but I am limited to a rule book at witch I am to the limits now. So I must move elsewhere to gain advantages. Dale |
Post Reply Tell a Friend (must be logged in) Alert Admin About Post |
Where am I? Original Top of thread | | | |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation | |||
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation -- komet99 | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: randykimball ® 04/13/2007, 08:48:02 Author Profile eMail author Edit |
Are your throw weights on lever arms?
If so, if you lenghtn the arms slightly you will put more clamping force on the disk stack. This will greatly increase your grip and reduce the clutch grab time. Do this without reducing the amount of disk surface. More disks means more grip, more surface means more grip... with more compression force from the increased leverage from longer throw weight arms. The worst suggestion of your lifetime may be the catalyst to the grandest idea of the century, never let suggestions go unsaid nor fail to listen to them. |
Post Reply Tell a Friend (must be logged in) Alert Admin About Post |
Where am I? Original Top of thread | | | |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation | |||
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation -- randykimball | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: komet99 ® 04/13/2007, 09:35:33 Author Profile eMail author Edit |
No they are not on lever arms. The weights slide on a wedge as clutch rpm increases. I currently have tungsten secondary weights installed in the clutch. I am looking at putting rhenium secondary weights as a replacement for more weight. I just dont want to damage the disc with to much force. Is there anyone who makes a stronger friction material?? Take a look at kartclutches dot com. got to the axle clutch link and there is a breakdown of the clutch I am using. Dale Admin: Changed url with the word "dot" Modified by Administrator at Fri, Apr 13, 2007, 09:39:31 |
Post Reply Tell a Friend (must be logged in) Alert Admin About Post |
Where am I? Original Top of thread | | | |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation | |||
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation -- komet99 | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: Kelly Bramble ® 04/13/2007, 09:47:15 Author Profile eMail author Edit |
Other considerations; Mass of the drive train: The more the cumulative components weight, the more horse power it will take to spin them up to the desired angular velocity. However, the more mass you have, the more energy it will take to slow the drive train down, thus more initial acceleration. Bearings: These need to be low friction, low mass, and aligned properly. Do you have performance charts/curves (test data) of the clutch(s) that you are using? This is the only way to be objective about your clutch selection and use. Looking at the design is interesting and fun, however not revealing. Modified by Kelly Bramble at Fri, Apr 13, 2007, 09:50:22 |
Post Reply Tell a Friend (must be logged in) Alert Admin About Post |
Where am I? Original Top of thread | | | |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation | |||
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation -- Kelly Bramble | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: CCR5600Design ® 04/20/2007, 15:37:05 Author Profile eMail author Edit |
I am wondering... Do your class rules require you to run an axle-mounted clutch? Since the clutch does not engage quickly enough for you due to the slower axle speed as compared to crankshaft RPM, why not use a crankshaft or jackshaft mounted clutch which will engage quicker? Ron "What we need are more people who specialize in the impossible." - Theodore Roethke |
Post Reply Tell a Friend (must be logged in) Alert Admin About Post |
Where am I? Original Top of thread | | | |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation | |||
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: centrifigal clutch operation -- CCR5600Design | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: komet99 ® 04/20/2007, 16:10:19 Author Profile eMail author Edit |
No, the rules say the clutch must not leak. So I chose the axle clutch. Tests have proven that it is easier to rotate the axle clutch than any other clutch available due to the gear ratio. I have reduced spring pressure and installed new clutch discs for another test at the next race. Bones |
Post Reply Tell a Friend (must be logged in) Alert Admin About Post |
Where am I? Original Top of thread |
Powered by Engineers Edge
© Copyright 2000 - 2024, by Engineers Edge, LLC All rights reserved. Disclaimer